The best Side of pld case laws

The best Side of pld case laws

Blog Article

In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only carried out Should the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence plus the petitioner company responded on the allegations as a result they were well aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to get appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by legislation." It is properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Because the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be achieved, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or even the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. They also stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance struggling with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, they are directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more

Since the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is reached, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in aid with the Supreme Court, guaranteeing the enforcement of its judgments. As being the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been arrived at, the decision of your Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. Read more

Because of this, simply just citing the case is more more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think about it as calling a person to tell them you’ve found their shed phone, then telling them you live in these-and-this sort of community, without actually offering them an address. Driving within the neighborhood attempting to find their phone is probably going to generally be more frustrating than it’s worthy of.

163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is perfectly-settled that when taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to consider the merit of all the suitable candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of eligible candidates who are found to become most meritorious amongst them. For the reason that petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored by the respondent department just to increase favor to your blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy to the part of the respondent department.

This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mildew the relief to make it suitable on the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified with the decision with the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance in the respondents that pensionary benefits could possibly be withheld on account with the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 with the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced. These contain if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set through the government.

Summaries of cases that form the lives of younger individuals, ensuring a further understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and fanatics alike.

Because of their position between the two main systems of law, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as mixed systems of regulation.

The learned Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced via the findings inside the Impugned order, after recording of evidence of the respective parties. Read here more